Latest Activity

Alex replied to Paul Lincoln's discussion Cancellation of windows consultation event
"Iain, the costs have been published…"
5 hours ago
Charlotte Borger posted an event
Thumbnail

We're re-opening!! at The Charterhouse

April 12, 2021 at 6pm to December 31, 2021 at 7pm
The Charterhouse is delighted to announce that we are re-opening for tours on Tuesday 1st June.If…See More
8 hours ago
Tim Godsmark posted a discussion

Open Letter to the City of London from GLERA and the Barbican Association

From the Chairs of the Barbican Association and the Golden Lane Residents AssociationTo the…See More
22 hours ago
Christine Clifford posted a discussion

Our New Normal - A community event proposal

Post lockdownthis morning we met with Councillor Sue Peason and others to chat about a community…See More
yesterday

Forum

HEALTH & WELLBEING

105 discussions

ESTATE OFFICE ANNOUNCEMENTS

563 discussions

GENERAL COMMENTS & QUERIES

1294 discussions

MAJOR WORKS & PROJECTS

116 discussions

COLPAI

Site of former Richard Cloudesley School

167 discussions

BERNARD MORGAN HOUSE

16 discussions

COMMUNITY CENTRE

17 discussions

ITEMS FOR SALE OR RECYCLE

210 discussions

@GoldenLaneEC1

Text Box

Facebook

There are four Golden Lane Estate related facebook accounts and you can follow them here: goldenlaneEC1 

Golden Lane Estate / RCS site 

Save Bernard Morgan House

City of London

GLERA letter to City Matters re Sir Mark Boleat

Sir Mark Boleat has a vision for housing in London. It just doesn’t happen to involve anyone who actually lives here. (London’s housing crisis can be solved by reining in middle-class nimbys, Evening Standard, 18th October). He would like to see local communities and their councillors excised completely from the planning process. As chair of one of those pesky City of London residents’ groups he scorns in his remarks, I have seen the future he envisages for London close up.

His team plans to extend our Estate with a social housing scheme two and a half times the maximum density and three times the height that planning policy permits, with no outdoor space, no playground and a tower block with a Grenfell-style single escape staircase. As local residents we stand up for getting decent, good quality social housing on the site, not repeating the disastrous mistakes of the 1960’s.

Of course these new social housing voters will be strategically placed in Islington, just a few feet outside the City boundary. After all, Sir Mark’s policy is for housing, yes, just not in his backyard.

It was local “nimbys” who campaigned against the absence of affordable housing at The Denizen, Taylor Wimpey’s overbearing development. In the end their in-lieu payment provided 14 affordable homes. If planning guidelines had been followed then TW would have been supplying 66 affordable homes off site.

Weakening planning rules creates opportunities for developers and house builders. Sir Mark’s networking/lobby group, the loftily titled “Housing and Finance Institute” brings them together with financiers and local authorities, as they put it “building relationships between capable councils, businesses and investors who want to do more”.

If Sir Mark has so little time for the role of local Councillors in standing up to development plans that bulldoze planning policies and communities then perhaps it is time he resigned from the City of London planning committee and focussed on those important housing industry partnerships instead.

© 2021   Created by Paul Lincoln.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service